I chose an
article that discusses the sustainability of lands, which is an important topic
for us to deal with the environmental issues and the population growth.
First, when we
hear the image of urban city regarding of environmental issues, we usually don’t
picture a positive image; we think of crowds, smells, dense air and polluted
water etc. However, this article introduces interesting and innovative ideas of
how to live cooperatively with nature in the cities.
According to the
article, people who live in cities can live efficiently in using the resources
than those who live in countryside. This is because humans usually use land
areas for living and acquiring natural resources, and the more people live
densely, the less area will be used as a living area. Therefore, author
considers the coexistence of human and nature in urban cities by implementing
new technology.
In fact, there
are already lots of achievements in urban cities. One of the famous examples is
that constructing a park on the top of the building to emit fresh air and to
enjoy the nature for tired, busy people. Yet, he claims that more new ideas are
needed to deal with the current situation. He gives an example of farming in a
urban side, which makes it possible to clean the water, the air and also to
grow the plants efficiently.
Furthermore, the
writer talks about the changing ecosystem. Now, the animals are getting used to
the urban life, and introducing their life style in an urban style; their foods
are wastes came from humans, nesting their habitats to skyscrapers. He says
that as the animals are getting to depend on our environment, we need to
develop further in order for animals to live more comfortably together.
Reading briefly
through this article, however, I cannot think this is really a realistic idea.
Even though parks are built on the skyscrapers, more concentration on people in
the urban side just causes confusion and frustration. The author’s idea is similar
to what Japanese do in the train in the morning. In short, we use the time efficiently
by riding on a crowded train. Even though we can save our time rather than
waiting a vacant train coming to a platform, we don’t feel good at all.
Concentration in the same area may save the land, but at the same time, it
causes huge stress to residents.
Furthermore, I
stress that ecosystem was changed not because animals wanted to. Rather, they
cannot help but change into a urban style as the humans destroy their natural
inhabitants. It is hard not to be self-sufficient in living because we want to
live in a best way to be comfortable, but we need to think about the
sustainability of our life for the animals and for the next generations. We
need to cherish our lands, and I don’t agree that technology is always the
solution for the environmental issues.
This is the article: Go
I generally agree with the author’s opinion meanwhile I can agree with Marino’s opinion too. As Marino mentioned, humans have been destroying the environment, however, we have achieved to acquire and develop new technologies in return. So I think we should make the best use of those not to worsen today’s situation. I do not think this is all about using technology. All people should share the concern over the environment issues in the first place then we can make actions for the earth.
ReplyDeleteIt is totally selfish and unacceptable thing that we change the environment just to make our lives comfortable. We should never clear up this problem by just calling it “ an unique ecosystem”. Also I don’t think it is really contributed for solving the environmental problems by making a garden on the top of a scraper or such things. To me, it sounds like an expiation of destroying the environment: people do look away from the problem, because they know there is no effective solution for that. However, it is also true that evolving is needed for all animals unless they live on the earth. This is kind of a universal law, which is inevitable for all creatures including human being and we have to follow it anyway. So I think, what we have to consider is the balance between development and preservation.
ReplyDelete